(Application
for copies should be addressed to the American Society
for Testing and Materials, 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia,
PA 19103-1187.)
GENERAL
MOTORS ENGINEERING STANDARDS - GM 9540P-97 Accelerated
Corrosion Test
(Non-Government standards and other publications are
normally available from the organizations that prepare
or distribute the documents. These documents also may
be available in or through libraries or other informational
services.)
2.3
Order of precedence. In the event of a conflict
between the text of this document and the references
cited herein, the text of this document takes precedence.
Nothing in this document, however, supersedes applicable
laws and regulations unless a specific exemption
has been obtained.
3.
REQUIREMENTS - Back
to top of Document
3.1
Material. All material used shall be as specified
herein, on the drawings, or in the contract.
3.2
Preproduction approval (type I and V).
3.2.1
Procedure approval (type I and V).
Prior to production, a detailed written procedure
identifying cleaning, pretreatment and painting
processes shall be submitted to the procuring agency
for approval. Process time, temperature, chemical
concentrations, process controls and acceptance
criteria and any other pertinent details shall
be listed for each step of the application process.
The procedure shall include the manufacturer and
exact proprietary designation of any material used
as well as any equipment used in the application
of the procedure. The complete procedure which
demonstrates ability to pass the performance tests
contained herein is to be signed by a company official
prior to its submittal for approval. Deviation
from the approved procedure is not permitted without
written approval from the procuring agency.
3.2.2
Preproduction validation panels. The contractor
shall coat twelve (4 X 6 inch) panels (see 4.2.2) by the proposed zinc phosphate coating
procedure outlined for use in the contract. The
test panels shall be the same substrate as will
be used in production. Standard test coupons may
be used for processing low carbon steels only.
Six of the coupons shall be coated with the primer
(or paint for single coat systems) to be used in
production. The primer dry film thickness shall
be no greater than 1.5 mils unless otherwise specified
in the contract. Three of the nonprimed coupons
shall be checked for coating weight (see 4.2.6.1),
and the resultant coating weight test analysis
report shall be provided to the procuring agency.
Three of the primed coupons shall be performance
tested by the contractor in neutral salt spray
(see 4.2.8)
unless superceded by an accelerated corrosion test
specified in the contract. See
4.2.8.1 for zinc or zinc alloy coated surfaces.
The remaining six panels (three phosphated only;
three phosphate plus primer) shall be forwarded
to the procuring activity for evaluation and testing.
3.2.3
Stress relief. Unless otherwise specified in
contract, parts cold worked after heat treatment
and parts having a hardness of Rockwell C40 or
greater shall be stress relieved prior to phosphating.
3.3
Cleaning methods.
3.3.1
Removal of soils, corrosion and weld by-products.
The parts shall be thoroughly free of oil, grease,
wax, dirt, scale, and other foreign matter and
shall not show visible signs of red or white corrosion
products. The water break test specified in 4.2.3.1 shall
be used to check for freedom from organic contaminants.
Inorganic contamination may still be present even
if the water break test is acceptable. All weld
slag/flux residues shall be removed. Weld spatter
shall be removed from all surfaces exposed to normal
view in the end item configuration. If the weld
spatter has been overcoated with a zinc or zinc
alloy deposit, removal of the spatter is not required
unless there are cosmetic concerns. The method
or combination of methods used shall be selected
to suit the properties of the metal, the type of
soil and the degree of contamination present. Method
VI shall not be used on steels with hardness greater
than Rockwell C40 unless test data can substantiate
that the combined phosphoric acid cleaning and
phosphate-coating treatment is not too severe for
the steels being treated or that an adequate hydrogen
embrittlement relief bake has been performed. Acid
pickling shall not be used unless specifically
approved or authorized by the drawing or specification
for the item being processed.
3.3.2
Rinsing. Adequate rinsing shall be performed
following any chemical process to remove residual
material remaining from the cleaning operation.
Special care shall be exercised in rinsing complex
shapes to prevent contamination of any subsequent
cleaning or coating process. The water rinse, after
the cleaning operation, shall be checked for contamination
as measured by total alkali or total acid. The
rinse shall be regulated so that the total alkali
contamination does not exceed 0.5 ml plus any total
alkalinity correction factor in the water, or the
total acid contamination does not exceed 0.5 ml
(see 4.2.4). With
the approval of the contracting office, conductivity
devices may be used to automatically regulate the
flow of rinse water according to rate of production.
3.3.3
Drying. Care shall be exercised to ensure complete
drying in crevices, seams, or other difficult to
dry places prior to painting.
3.4
Processing requirements (types I, II, and V).
3.4.1
Cleaning. Cleaning shall be in accordance with 3.3.1.
3.4.2
Rinse after cleaning. Rinsing after cleaning
shall be in accordance with 3.3.2.
3.4.3
Chemical conversion coating.
3.4.3.1
Type 1 and type V. The properly cleaned articles
shall be subjected to a balanced aqueous solution
containing phosphoric acid, zinc, and accelerating
agents until a uniform, insoluble, phosphate coating
is produced. Dated records should be maintained
for the chemical analyses and additions made to
the solutions.
3.4.3.1.1
For type I only. Unless otherwise specified,
type I zinc phosphate processes shall incorporate
a crystal modifier or grain refining accelerator
in the phosphating solution, a separate grain refiner
as a pretreatment or a grain refiner addition to
the cleaner.
3.4.3.2
Type II. The properly cleaned articles shall
be subjected to a balanced aqueous solution containing
phosphoric acid or acid phosphate salts with or
without the addition of accelerating agents until
a uniform insoluble phosphate coating is produced.
3.4.4
Rinse after phosphating (types 1, II, and V).
Phosphating shall be followed by a clean water
rinse, less than 100ºF or 38ºC, in order to remove
residual salts and unreacted phosphating material.
3.4.5
Final rinse (types I, II, and V). Proprietary
final acid/alkaline rinses are available and permissible
for use over phosphate coatings provided they are
specifically approved by the procuring agency.
The materials, temperature, concentrations, and
other process controls (including replenishment
and discard criteria) shall be stated in the procedure.
Phosphatized coatings must meet the requirements
specified for paint adhesion and salt spray resistance
or must meet those requirements specified for the
designated coating system (see
6.8).
3.5
General requirements.
3.5.1
Appearance (type 1, II, and V). All coatings
shall be continuous, uniform in texture, and evenly
distributed.
3.5.1.1
Type I, zinc phosphate. Type I coating deposits
shall be gray to black in color. The coating shall
be uniformly colored and be free of smut, powder,
corrosion products, or white stains. Non-uniformity
of color due to heat treatment, composition of
the base metal, the degree of cold work performed
on the base metal or presence of brown or orange
stains inherent from the acidified final rinsing
process shall not be cause for rejection.
3.5.2
Lighting conditions. A minimum light intensity
of 50 lumens per square ft or 538 lux shall be
provided at the working surface where manually
controlled paint finish operations are performed.
Minimum lighting applies to the manufacturing operations
as well as in-process and final inspection areas
(see 4.2.1.1).
3.5.3
Phosphate coating weight (types I, II, and V).
Coating weight shall be controlled or tested as
in paragraphs 4.2.6.1.1, 4.2.6.1.2,
and 4.2.6.1.3.
Coating weights as defined below are applicable.
3.5.3.1
Type I zinc phosphate coatings. Type I coatings
may be applied by spray, dip or immersion and permit
a minimum coating weight of 150 mg/ft2 for spray
applications and 300 mg/ft2 for immersion applications.
A maximum coating weight of 500 mg/ft2 is specified
for all application methods.
3.5.3.2
Type II aqueous iron phosphate coating. Type
II has a minimum coating weight of 35 mg/ft2.
3.5.3.3
Type V zinc phosphate coatings. Type V zinc
phosphate requires a coating weight between 500
- 1100 mg/ft2 inclusively.
3.5.4
Film thickness (type III only). The dry film
thickness shall be 0.0003 to 0.0005 inch when tested
as in 4.2.7.1.
3.5.5
Application of organic coating. The organic
coating shall be applied to thoroughly dried surfaces
within 24 hours after pretreatment. The dried surface
shall not show any rusting or soiling prior to
painting. The temperature of the metal surface
shall be controlled to eliminate blistering, poor
adhesion or unsightly film results.
3.5.6
Paint thickness. For all tests requiring painted
test specimens, the dry film thickness (see 4.2.7) on all surfaces shall be
as specified for the end item. When the paint thickness
is not covered in the end item specification, the
drawing, or paint specification requirement, the
precedence shall be in the order cited in the contract.
3.5.7
Paint adhesion (all methods and types). The
CARC or non-CARC (e.g., alkyd, enamels, lacquers,
etc.) painted items or specimens shall show the
following satisfactory paint adhesion when tested
as in 4.2.7.2 and 4.2.7.3.
3.5.7.1
CARC painted items. An ASTM D3359 rating lower
than 3B or the removal of two or more complete
squares of topcoat or top coat-primer-pretreatment
coating from any test unit constitutes failure
of this test (see 4.2.7.2).
3.5.7.2
Non-CARC painted items. Unsatisfactory adhesion
shall be indicated by exposure of bare metal or
underlying phosphate pretreatment by any of the
following conditions:
(a)
Any area exceeding 1/8 inch average diameter.
(b) More than one area exceeding 1/16 inch average
diameter.
(c) More than five areas less than 1/16 inch diameter.
3.5.8.
Accelerated corrosion resistance (all types).
After pretreatment and primer (or paint for single
coat systems) application, the specimens subjected
to the salt fog test as in 4.2.8 for
the number of hours prescribed shall show no more
than 1/8 inch creep, blistering, or loss of adhesion
of the paint from the scribe mark. There shall
be no more than a trace of film failure (rust grade
no. 9, ASTM D610), and not more than 5 scattered
blisters, none larger than 3/64 inch in diameter
on a 4 by 6 inch test panel or equivalent area
of test specimen or item. For items or specimens
having an area less than 24 square inches, a proportionately
smaller number of failed areas will be permitted.
Neutral salt spray testing shall not be used to
qualify zinc or zinc alloy coated substrates (see 4.2.8.2 and 6.1.3).
3.5.9
Relief of hydrogen embrittlement. After cleaning
by method VI or phosphating, parts having a hardness
of Rockwell C40 or greater shall be heat treated
for 8 hours at 210-225ºF (99-107ºC) or must be
held for 240 hours at room temperature, prior to
release, to relieve any embrittlement due to hydrogen.
3.5.10
Hydrogen embrittlement relief test. Adequate
verification tests must be performed for all parts
having a hardness of Rockwell C40 or greater. Treated
parts shall not reveal any developing cracks upon
subsequent inspection (see 4.2.9).
3.5.11
Toxicity. The solvents used in methods II –
VI shall have no adverse effects on human health
when used as intended (see 6.1). Material safety
Data sheets (MSDS) must be prepared, submitted
and made available in accordance with FED-STD-313;
additionally, they must conform to 29 CFR 1910.1200
(see 6.3).
4.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS - Back
to top of Document
4.1
Responsibility for inspection. Unless otherwise
specified in the contract or purchase order, the
contractor is responsible for the performance of
all inspection requirements (examinations and tests)
as specified herein. Except as otherwise specified
in the contract or purchase order, the contractor
may use his own or any other facilities suitable
for the performance of the inspection requirements
specified herein, unless disapproved by the Government.
The Government reserves the right to perform any
of the inspections set forth in this specification
where such inspections are deemed necessary to
ensure supplies and services conform to prescribed
requirements.
4.1.1
Responsibility for compliance. All items shall
meet all requirements of section 3. The inspections
set forth in this specification shall become a
part of the contractor's overall inspection system
or quality program. The absence of any inspection
requirements in the specification shall not relieve
the contractor of the responsibility of ensuring
that all products or supplies submitted to the
Government for acceptance comply with all requirements
of the contract. Sampling inspection, as part of
manufacturing operations, is an acceptable practice
to ascertain conformance to requirements, however,
this does not authorize submission of known defective
material, either indicated or actual, nor does
it commit the Government to accept defective material.
4.2
Test methods.
4.2.1
Tests. Tests shall be conducted as required
in this specification. The right is reserved to
make any additional tests deemed necessary to determine
that the process meets the requirements of this
specification. 4.2.1.1 Lighting
adequacy. Should adequate lighting appear suspect
at the work/inspection surface, a light intensity
meter shall be used to assure that 50 lumens per
square ft or 538 lux minimum is provided.
4.2.2
Test specimens. Test specimens shall be prepared
from actual production items or parts thereof,
or if size is prohibitive, from scrap parts of
the same kind and finish (from the same manufacturing
lot if possible) which have been rejected for causes
other than phosphating, material composition, heat
treatment or any combination thereof. Specimens
need not be identical in shape or size but shall
be stamped, etched, or otherwise indelibly marked
for identification as a test specimen. When used,
standard panels shall be not less than 4 x 6 x
1/32 inch in size. Standard panels (e.g. SAE 1010)
may be used when authorized by the contracting
officer and shall conform to ASTM A109 or ASTM
A366 having a Rockwell B hardness of 55 to 75,
and a surface roughness of 30 to 45 microinches
(arithmetic average) as rolled. For zinc coated
surfaces, the panels shall be made of the same
coated material as specified in the contract. When
coated steels are used, the standard test panels
shall be made of the same material as that specified
in the contract. All test specimens of standard
panels shall be processed through all the cleaning,
phosphating, painting, and drying steps along with
the items being processed. Test specimens shall
not be reused.
4.2.3
Removal of soils, corrosion, and weld by-products.
Care should be taken when identifying the type
of soil that is to be removed, as cleaning materials
which may be effective against one type of contaminant
may be ineffective against another. Multiple cleaning
procedures may be required to provide the required
water break free surface. After cleaning and rinsing,
and prior to phosphating, at least two test specimens
shall be subjected to a water break test at the
conclusion of a maximum of every four hours of
production. These specimens shall be dried and
examined visually for rust, corrosion products,
and soils. If specimens fail the water break test
or if the surface shows signs of soils or corrosion
products, all items processed since last acceptance
shall be rejected and corrective action taken.
After corrective action, testing shall be continued
at least once every hour until indications of soils
or corrosion products are eliminated. Testing frequency
shall then revert to at least two test specimens
at the conclusion of a maximum of every four hours
of production.
4.2.3.1
Water break test. The water break test shall
be conducted by subjecting the surface to a mist
of distilled water by means of a convenient small
atomizing device. If the water droplets tend to
coalesce into large lenses lasting for 25 seconds
(without a sudden flashout), the surface shall
be considered as having satisfactorily passed the
water break test. If the water gathers into droplets
within 25 seconds (if the surface shows a “water
break” within that time), the surface shall be
considered as having failed the test. If the water
forms a continuous film by flashing out suddenly
over a large area, this shall be considered as
evidence of the presence of an impurity on the
surface such as free alkali, residual detergent,
etc., and the surface shall be considered as having
failed the test. Failure to support an unbroken
water film shall be sufficient cause to do additional
cleaning. If more than four hours have passed since
performing the water break test, re-examine the
surface for corrosion, foreign matter or oily residues
and repeat the water break test prior to pretreatment.
Cleaning materials which may be effective against
one type of contaminant may be ineffective against
others. Multiple cleaning procedures may be required
to provide the required water break free surface.
4.2.4
Rinsing. The water rinses after the cleaning
and phosphate operation shall be tested for contamination
after every four hours of production (see
3.3.2).
4.2.4.1
Total alkali contamination test. Take a 10
ml sample of the rinse solution, dilute to 50 ml
with distilled water and add 5 drops of Bromcresol
Green Indicator. Slowly add testing solution (0.1N
HCl) from a burette until the color of sample changes
from blue-green to pale yellow. This is the endpoint
and the number of ml of acid testing solution used
is the total alkali contamination.
4.2.4.2
Total acid contamination test. Take a 10 ml
sample of the rinse solution, dilute to 50 ml with
distilled water and add 5 drops of phenolphthalein
indicator. Slowly add alkaline testing solution
(0.1N NaOH) from burette until the first permanent
pink color is produced. This is the endpoint and
the number of ml of alkaline testing solution used
is the total acid contamination.
4.2.5
Final rinse. The final rinse shall be tested,
replenished and discarded in accordance with procedures
designated by the suppliers of the final rinse
chemicals; these quality assurance provisions shall
be documented in the approved procedure. Solution
analysis shall be performed every four hours of
production.
4.2.6
Phosphating process controls. All process control
tests shall be conducted every four hours of production
or as specified in the contract.
4.2.6.1
Phosphate coating weight (types I, II, and V).
Three test specimens (see 4.2.2), at the conclusion of a maximum of
every four hours of phosphate processing, shall
be selected by the inspector for the test which
is to be performed within one hour of processing
to assure uniform coating weights are maintained.
The clean, dry specimens shall be accurately weighed
and the surface area of each calculated. The coating
weight shall be determined according to the formula
in 4.2.6.2.
Acceptance criteria specified in 3.5.3 are
determined as outlined in 4.2.6.2.
Unless otherwise approved by the procuring agency,
the following stripping procedures shall be used.
4.2.6.1.1
Zinc phosphate stripping (types I and V) for coating
weight determination on steel. The phosphate
coating shall be completely removed by immersion
in a sodium hydroxide/tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid (EDTA) solution for 15 minutes at 70ºF (21ºC).
The solution can be formulated by adding 125 grams
of sodium hydroxide and 125 grams of tetrasodium
EDTA to 750 ml of deionized water. Upon removal
from the stripping solution, rinse the samples
in water, dry the test specimens and reweigh to
the nearest milligram. Repeat this process, in
five minute increments, until a constant weight
is obtained.
4.2.6.1.2
Iron phosphate stripping (type II) for coating
weight determination on steel. The phosphate
coating shall be completely removed by immersion
in a sodium hydroxide/sodium tartrate solution
for 15 minutes at 70ºF (21ºC). The solution can
be formulated by adding 50 grams of sodium hydroxide
and 10 grams of sodium tartrate to 940 ml of deionized
water. Upon removal from the stripping solution,
rinse the samples in water, dry the test specimens
and reweigh to the nearest milligram. Repeat this
process, in five minute increments, until a constant
weight is obtained.
4.2.6.1.3
Phosphate stripping for coating weight determination
on zinc and zinc alloy coated steels (types I and
V). The phosphate coating shall be completely
removed by immersion in ammonium dichromate stripping
solution for 5 minutes at approximately 70ºF (21ºC).
The solution can be formulated by adding 40 grams
of ammonium dichromate to 2.5 liters of ammonium
hydroxide. Adequate ventilation is required when
using these chemicals. Upon removal from the stripping
solution, use a white plastic policeman to gently
scrape the surfaces to remove any residual coating
and rinse the samples in water. Dry the test specimens
and reweigh to the nearest milligram. Repeat this
process until a constant weight is obtained.
4.2.6.2
Coating weight formula . The coating weight
is determined by the formula below:
Coating wt = (Initial wt in g - Final
wt in g) (144,000 inch2 mg/g ft2)
(mg/ft2)
Total surface area in square inches
where
the initial weight in grams represents the weight
of the phosphate coated specimen
and
where the final weight in grams is the weight of
the stripped specimen
or Coating wt = (Initial weight
in mg - Final weight in mg)
(mg/m2)
Total surface area in square meters
Intervals
of four hours production shall be considered acceptable
for testing, provided that the average coating weight
of the 3 specimens equals or exceeds the minimum
coating weight required (see 3.5.3) for
the applicable type and not more than one sample
falls below the minimum. The sample falling below
the minimum shall be within 10 percent of the minimum
requirement. The production lot represented by the
failed test shall be reworked and corrective action
taken until production is again acceptable. When
determining the surface area of irregularly shaped
objects, consideration and care should be taken to
correctly determine the surface area of both the
inner and outer surfaces of the test piece.
4.2.6.3
Phosphate coating process controls. Discard
(dump) criteria shall be established for each chemical
phase of the process. A free acid, total acid and
accelerator titration as specified or recommended
by the supplier's maintenance procedure for control.
If additional process control tests such as titanium
concentration or ferrous iron are required by the
chemical suppliers product technical bulletin,
these additional tests shall also be performed
by the contractor.
4.2.7
Organic coating controls. Organic coatings
must be applied in accordance with applicable coating
application, system, or item specification.
4.2.7.1
Thickness of coatings. All applicable surfaces
shall be coated and the basis for acceptance (including
the number of specimens tested) shall be as specified
in the contract. All coatings, inorganic and organic
shall be checked daily for dry film thickness,
as required by the applicable specification or
drawing. Film thickness gages shall be used for
determining organic coating thickness (see 6.9)
after the gage has been standardized using the
same surface as that over which the organic finish
has been applied.
4.2.7.2
Adhesion test for CARC. After the complete
(specified) paint finish has been applied and cured,
three samples from each lot shall be selected for
paint adhesion testing (see 4.2.2). Adhesion testing on the painted
test specimens shall be performed after the complete
paint finish has fully cured. A two coat paint
system should be tested after drying in accordance
with applicable paint specifications. Each sample
shall be tested using ASTM D3359, method B. Nonconformance
to 3.5.7.1 shall
constitute failure of this test. All items processed
since last acceptance shall be rejected and corrective
action shall be taken.
4.2.7.3
Paint adhesion test for non-CARC. Unless otherwise
specified, a minimum of two test specimens (see 4.2.2) from each day's production shall
be run through all steps of the regular production
process including painting. Adhesion testing on
the painted test specimens should be performed
after the coating has dried in accordance with
the applicable paint specification. Press a 2 inch
length of a somewhat longer piece of pressure-sensitive
adhesive tape (3/4 inch width) conforming to ASTM-D5486
(type I or type II), firmly onto a flat or cylindrical
surface of the item, rubbing out all air bubbles
under the tape. Allow approximately 10 seconds
for the test area to return to room temperature.
Grasp a free end of the tape and at a rapid speed
strip it from the item by pulling the tape back
upon itself at 180 degrees (in such a manner that
the tape is folded back to back during the procedure).
Observe for bared areas where the paint is removed.
Disregard flecks of paint on tape where the underlying
metal or phosphate coating is not visibly exposed.
Nonconformance to 3.5.7.2 shall
constitute failure of this test, and all item processed
since last acceptance shall be rejected and corrective
action shall be taken.
4.2.8
Accelerated corrosion resistance. Prior to
initiation of production, or whenever a change
in production or paint occurs, or when required
by the procuring activity, a minimum of three test
specimens (see
4.2.2), shall be run through all steps of the
regular production process including primer application.
Specimens having a hardness of Rockwell C40 or
greater shall be treated for relief of hydrogen
embrittlement prior to painting. The specimens
shall be coated and cured for the time and temperature
recommended for use in production. When approved
by the procuring activity, an alternate test may
be used (see 6.4),
which allows one of the organic coatings listed
in table II, paragraph 6.8.2 to
be substituted for that used in production. The
painted specimens shall be scribed in a vertical
direction in a manner described in ASTM D1654.
In instances where more than one metal is used,
each metal shall be rated. During production, one
specimen (see 4.2.2)
from each day's production shall be subjected to
the accelerated corrosion test specified below
(4.2.8.1, 4.2.8.2),
until five consecutive days' production have successfully
passed the test. Sampling may then be reduced to
one sample twice per week. If failure occurs, all
items processed since last acceptance shall be
rejected and corrective action taken. Sampling
shall revert to one specimen from each day's production
until five consecutive days' production have again
successfully passed the test. For the purpose of
this test, the significant surface on cylindrical
items shall be an area 60º on either side of a
scribe mark. Production shall not be initiated
until results of the salt spray test are received,
except at the contractor's risk. When specified,
the painted specimens may be scribed with two intersecting
lines using the scribe tool described in ASTM D1654,
(see 6.4 h).
4.2.8.1
Ferrous surfaces. The specimens, prepared above
(4.2.8),
shall then be exposed to the 5 percent salt spray
specified in ASTM B117. Unless otherwise specified,
epoxies shall be tested for 336 hours. Electrocoat
primers shall be tested for 1000 hours. Within
24 to 48 hours after removal from the salt fog
cabinet, the test coupon will be scraped with a
metal putty knife at a 30 degree contact angle
to the scribed surface and evaluation made for
compliance to paragraph 3.5.8 for
CARC systems.
4.2.8.2
Zinc or zinc alloy coated surfaces. All pretreatments
and primers used on zinc or zinc alloy coated surfaces
shall be qualified for 40 cycles by the GM 9540P
accelerated cyclic corrosion test. The test protocol
and calibration tests for mass loss shall be conducted
as noted in the test specification. The test coupons
will be subjected to 40 cycles of testing, and
upon removal from the cabinet, the coupons will
be scraped with a metal putty knife at a 30 degree
contact angle to the scribed surface, and coupons
shall meet the acceptance criteria as specified
in paragraph 3.5.8 for
CARC systems.
4.2.9
Hydrogen embrittlement relief test. Unless
otherwise specified, the test for the effectiveness
of the procedures used to control hydrogen embrittlement
is performed using procedures outlined in ASTM
F519 using a type 1 a specimen at a frequency of
every 90 to 120 days.
5.
PACKAGING - Back to top of
Document
5.1
Packaging is not applicable to this specification.
6.
NOTES - Back
to top of Document
(This
section contains information of a general or explanatory
nature that may be helpful, but is not mandatory.)
6.1
Cleaning methods. The cleaning methods and chemical conversion coatings covered in this
specification are suitable for use as rust removers,
rust preventatives, and as metal conditioners for
ferrous metals prior to application of paints.
6.1.1
Ferrous surfaces. Cleaning methods are intended primarily for ferrous metal cleaning,
rust removing, descaling, or surface etching purposes
in conjunction with chemical pretreatment processes.
Method I (abrasive blasting) is generally recommended
to remove heavy rust and mill scale on metals with
thicknesses greater than 1/8 inch and, when specified,
may be coated without being given a conversion
coating. Method VI (phosphoric acid) may be used
to remove light to moderate rusting but is not
considered an acceptable substitute for a chemical
pretreatment process. The selection of the cleaning
process is dependent on the type and amount of
soil and corrosion products on the items.
6.1.2
Nonferrous surfaces. Certain cleaning processes in this specification may also be used
on nonferrous surfaces, for example: mechanical
cleaning, solvent cleaning, vapor degreasing, and
emulsion cleaning. Care should be exercised to
ensure that cleaning materials do not have detrimental
affects on the items being cleaned. In addition,
this specification covers ferrous metal items containing
small areas of zinc or aluminum surfaces or accessory
fabricated parts of zinc or aluminum requiring
treatment.
6.1.3
Nonferrous substrate testing variations.
Zinc or zinc alloy coated substrates are tested
in accordance with the GM 9540P accelerated cyclic
corrosion test for 40 cycles, (see 4.2.8.2),
then scraped after exposure and examined using
the same acceptance criteria noted for the accelerated
corrosion test in 3.5.8 of
this specification, unless an accelerated corrosion
test such as the sulfur dioxide salt spray test
specified in ASTM G85 is specified in the contract.
In that case, that test protocol rather than neutral
salt spray should be used to qualify the pretreatment/primer.
6.2
Chemical conversion and pretreatment coatings.
6.2.1
Type I. Type I process
is intended primarily for use as a general all
purpose pretreatment prior to painting on tanks,
trucks, sedans, ammunition and other items, as
specified and is generally recommended where climatic
exposure is anticipated. Type I is the preferred
pretreatment for zinc plated (ferrous substrate)
parts, prior to paint application.
6.2.2
Type II. Type II process
is intended primarily for use where metal parts
are to be formed (assembled) after painting and
for other end items as specified.
6.2.3
Type III. Type III is
intended for use where size and shape preclude
the use of types I, II, or V, and where items containing
mixed metal components are assembled prior to treatment.
6.3
Safety precautions. All safety requirements
stated herein apply in addition to any applicable
federal, state, and local rules or requirements.
Chemical suppliers or manufacturers instructions
and insurance underwriters instructions must be
followed to insure safe handling practices and
appropriate regulations governing chemicals. In
accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1200, Material Safety
Data Sheets (MSDS) are required for each hazardous
chemical used in an operation, and must be readily
available to personnel using the material. Contracting
officers will identify those activities requiring
copies of the MSDS.
6.4
Ordering data. Procurement contracts should
ensure that specific requirements/quality assurance
provisions are specified as indicated in the following
options:
(a)
Specification identification includes: title, revision
letter, and date of specification and any existing
amendment. Type of conversion pretreatment and coating
thickness classification must also be specified.
(b)
Cleaning method and type coating required (see
1.2).
(c)
Approval (see 3.2).
(d)
Process (see 3.4).
(e)
List each Material Safety Data sheet (MSDS) required
for any solvent used in method II – VI (see 3.5.11, 6.3)
(f)
Sampling and inspection (see
4.1).
(g)
Hydrogen embrittlement relief test (see 3.5.9, 4.2.9)
(h) Allowance of alternative method for testing coating resistance
to salt fog (see 4.2.7.2, 4.2.8, 6.1.3)
6.5
Preproduction approval (type I and V).
6.5.1
Army. Phosphatized coatings prepared for subsequent
paint application or other applications require
detailed information of the proposed procedure,
chemicals and equipment to be used. Preproduction
submittal and approval will be as specified by
the contracting officer.
6.5.1.1
Army preproduction procedure approval for types
I or V coatings. See 3.2 – 3.2.2.
6.5.2
Activities other than Army. Preproduction approval
will not be required for proposed processes for
applying crystalline phosphate base coatings that
correspond to the procedure outlined and described
in
6.5.3.
Unless otherwise specified, procedures, chemicals
and equipment which do not correspond to the procedures
in 6.5.3 will require preproduction approval of
the procuring agency.
6.5.3
Procedure (method of application of phosphate coating,
applicable to type I and type V). The phosphate
coating must be applied in a minimum of five stages.
Additional stages may be added at the option of
the contractor provided that the five basic stages
are retained. The minimum requirements for either
spray or dip application are as follows:
Stage
1, cleaning. The cleaning method used should be in
accordance with one of the methods of 1.2.1 or a
combination thereof.
Stage
2, rinse. The final cleaning method should be followed
by a clean hot water rinse 125º - 180ºF (52ºC - 82ºC),
or at temperature specifically recommended by manufacturer’s
instruction, with a constant overflow maintained
by the continuous addition of fresh water entering
from the bottom and/or by spraying fresh water on
the parts leaving the rinse.
Stage
3, phosphating. The properly cleaned articles or
items should be subjected to the phosphating solution
(see 3.4.3.1)
for at least the time required to secure the specified
coating weight in accordance with the supplier’s
recommendation. The equipment used must be
constructed of materials resistant to the action
of the phosphating solution and will not contain
copper alloy fittings or brazing where they may come
in contact with the solution. The phosphating bath
should be operated at temperatures and concentrations
designated by the suppliers. Dated records should
be maintained noting the periodic analyses and additions
to the solutions. Fog sprays should be provided on
both dip tanks and spray equipment to prevent the
solution from drying on the work surface prior to
the subsequent water rinse.
Stage
4, water rinse. A clean water rinse with a constant
overflow is maintained by the continuous addition
of fresh water entering from the bottom.
Stage
5, acidified rinse. A final acidified rinse should
be prepared and maintained in accordance with the
suppliers' recommendations (see 3.4.5). Such treatment
is beneficial to the removal of unreacted chemical
residues and provides a protective coating or seal
that improves corrosion resistance. Care should be
taken to maintain rinse at strengths that will not
stain or hinder the coating. As a starting point,
follow manufacturer’s suggestions for acidified rinse.
Experiment with conditions (time, temperature, and
agitation) to achieve optimum seal. Improper rinsing
techniques have a detrimental affect on items requiring
subsequent paint. Although the harmful effect on
the paint coating may not be immediately apparent,
it can result in early failure of the paint by blistering
or the rapid spread of corrosion products and flaking
from a scratch.
After
treatment, the phosphated parts are not to be handled
with bare hands, oily or contaminated gloves. Organic
finishing of prepared surfaces should not be delayed
as contamination from ambient sources may occur causing
a reduction in adhesion of the organic coating. Specification
requires application of coating within 24 hours of
pretreatment.
6.6
Type II. The properly cleaned articles or items
should be treated (see 3.4.3.2)
until a phosphate coating is produced which is
insoluble in water and has a color varying from
golden yellow to purple. The article or items should
be exposed to the phosphating solution in a spray
process for a minimum of one minute or 3 minutes
in an immersion process.
6.7
Type III. Correct film thickness is important
for MIL-C-8514, and DOD-P-15328 pretreatment coatings.
Small steel panels prepared with films, too thick,
too thin, and correct, may serve as visual color
guides for wash primer pretreatment.
6.8
Paint information. The information in tables
1 and II below is for illustrative purposes only;
it contains examples of test requirements, and
inspection and acceptance criteria that may be
useful.
TABLE
I. Paint information for non-CARC coatings. - Back
to top of Document
Test
MIL-E-52891 MIL-E-11195 - Dry film thickness, mils
0.9 - 1.1 1.3 - 1.7
Salt spray – air dry 72 Hours 7 Days, Exposure time,
hours 150 120
TABLE
II. Paint information for CARC coatings. - Back
to top of Document
Test
MIL-P-53022 MIL-P-53030 MIL-P-53084 - Dry film thickness,
Type I: 0.9 - 1.1 1.0 - 1.5 0.9 – 1.1
Mils Type II: 1.0 - 1.5
Cure (Dry) conditions air dry: air dry, for 20 min
@ metal (Recommended) 3 Days Type I 168 hr temp of
350ºF 7 Days Type II (177ºC), air cool to room temp
of 66-79ºF (19-26ºC) Salt Spray Exposure, 336 336 1000
Hours
6.9
The following instruments for measuring paint thickness have
been found to be satisfactory:
Elcometer
- Distributed by - Gardner Laboratory, Inc., Bethesda,
Maryland
Erichsen Paint Inspection Gage - Erichsen Instruments,
Inc., Akron, Ohio
"G.E." gage - General Electric Company, Schenectady,
New York
Lea gage - Lea Manufacturing Company, Waterbury, Connecticut
Positector 2000 - KTA-TATOR, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
6.10
Appearance. After application of chemical conversion
coating or use of one of the cleaning methods,
changes in appearance are to be expected. Conversion
coatings of types I, II, and V leave a chemical
deposit. Cleaning methods leave the metal surface
substantially bare. Method VI, alcoholic phosphoric
acid and phosphoric acid containing a solvent and
detergent discolors the surface. Method VI, hot
phosphoric acid with a detergent etches the surface.
Table
III lists examples of specification materials that
may be used for cleaning purposes.
TABLE
III. Specification material applicable to each method.
- Back
to top of Document
Cleaning
method Specification:
Method
I SSPC SF 5 - SSPC SF 10
Method
II1/ ASTM D 4081, ASTM D 4376, ASTM D 4080, A-A-2904,
MIL-C-15074
Method
III A-A-59146, A-A-59133, SAE AMS 1547
Method
IV MIL-C-11090, MIL-C-43616
Method
V A-A-59260
Method
VI MIL-C-10578
1)
Note: Ozone depleting solvents are no longer specified
for degreasing or cleaning the surface of parts.
Solvent selection is left to the discretion of the
manufacturer.
6.11
Temperature of base metal.
In general, metal temperatures should be lower
than 130ºF (54ºC) for cellulose lacquers and 160ºF
(71ºC) for enamels unless the coating material
has been specially formulated for the purpose.
Temperatures from 60ºF - 120ºF (16 - 49ºC) are
the most satisfactory (see 3.5.5). The temperature
of the surface must not exceed 225ºF (107ºC) prior
to painting, because heating above this temperature
tends to dehydrate the phosphate crystal and deteriorates
the basis coating.
6.12
Pretreatment. Application
of organic coatings over bare untreated ferrous
surfaces is not a recommended practice. Organic
coating should be applied to surfaces prepared
with a conversion coating or pretreatment.
6.13
Phosphate coating weights.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations
are imposed by both Federal and State agencies
which place a financial burden on the contractor.
Therefore, accurate alternative stripping methods
may be substituted for the stripping solution described
in paragraph 4.2.6.1 provided
the same accuracy could be maintained.
6.13.1
Scanning electron microscope.
The scanning electron microscope (SEM) is often
used to study the morphology of zinc phosphate
crystals. It can be used to assure proper coverage
on production parts and is useful for preproduction
approval.
6.13.2
Coating weight conversions.
Coating weights are given in mg/ft2 throughout
this specification. However, because there may
be a need to express the coating weight in mg/m2
, the following conversion factor is noted for
informational purposes: mg/m2 = (mg/ft2)
(10.764 ft2/m2)
6.14
Coating weight test results.
Quality assurance inspection tests performed in
accordance with paragraphs 4.2.6.1 and 4.2.6.2 are
mandated to ensure timeliness and availability
of the coating weights obtained. Coating weight
verification tests must be performed within one
hour of sample preparation to assure that process
controls are effective and that out-of-tolerance
conditions are rapidly corrected. Records, including
reports of the test results, must be maintained
at the phosphate application site and must be made
available upon request of the acquisition activity
(see 3.5.3 and 4.2.6.1).
6.15
Problem alloys. Alloys
such as AISI 4340 or SAE 4340 may be difficult
to process. It is important that the contractor
consult with the processing chemicals supplier
to work out a procedure that will achieve the desired
phosphatized coating with respect to coverage and
coating weight.
6.15.1
Type I, spray systems.
Stopping of the conveyor line while parts are being
processed is unacceptable. Parts subjected to a
line stoppage must be reworked should they fail
to meet visual acceptance criteria.
Custodians:
Preparing activity: Army MR Army - MR, Navy
– YD, Air Force – 11 Project No. MFFP-0676, GSA -
FSS
Review activities: Army- MI, CR, AV, EA, AR, AT, MD1,
Navy - MC, OS, SH, Air Force - 80
STANDARDIZATION
DOCUMENT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL - Back
to top of Document
INSTRUCTIONS
1.
The preparing activity must complete blocks 1, 2,
3, and 8. In block 1, both the document number and
revision letter must be given.
2.
The submitter of this form must complete blocks 4,
5, 6, and 7.
2.
The preparing activity must provide a reply within
30 days from receipt of the form.
NOTE:
This form may not be used to request copies of documents,
nor to request waivers, or clarification of requirements
on current contracts. Comments submitted on this
form do not constitute or imply authorization to
waive any portion of the referenced document(s) or
to amend contractual requirements.
I
RECOMMEND A CHANGE:
1.DOCUMENT
NUMBER: TT-C-490E
2.
DOCUMENT DATE(YYYYMMDD) - 20020722
3.
DOCUMENT TITLE: CHEMICAL CONVERSION COATINGS AND
PRETREATMENTS FOR FERROUS SURFACES (BASE FOR ORGANIC
COATINGS)
4.
NATURE OF CHANGE (Identify paragraph number and
include proposed rewrite, if possible. Attach extra
sheets as needed)
5.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
6.
SUBMITTER
a.
NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)
b.
ORGANIZATION
c.
ADDRESS (Include Zip Code) d.
TELEPHONE (Include Area Code)
(1)
Commercial
(2)
DSN (If applicable)
7.
DATE SUBMITTED - (YYYYMMDD)
8.
PREPARING ACTIVITY
a.
NAME
US
Army Research Laboratory - Weapons & Materials
Research Directorate
b. TELEPHONE
(Including Area Code)
(1)
Commercial (2) DSN (410) 306-0725 458-0725
C. ADDRESS
(Include Zip Code)
ARL/WMRD
ATTN: AMSRL-WM-MA
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5069
IF
YOU DO NOT RECEIVE A REPLY WITHIN 45 DAYS, CONTACT:
Defense Standardization
Program Office (DLSC-LM) 8725
John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2533, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221
Telephone (703) 767-6888 DSN 427-6888
DD Form 1426, FEB 1999 (EG) Previous edition is
obsolete WHS/DIOR, Feb 99
Back
to top of Document